https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401134 The High Court found errors in the Trial Court's acquittal of the accused, noting a failure to consider evidence and invoke the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act. The accused's defense did not sufficiently rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for a debt. The High Court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, ordering payment of Rs. 10 lakhs to the complainant within eight weeks or face imprisonment. The Trial Court's judgment was set aside, and the accused was directed to pay the specified amount. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:39:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401134 The High Court found errors in the Trial Court's acquittal of the accused, noting a failure to consider evidence and invoke the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act. The accused's defense did not sufficiently rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for a debt. The High Court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, ordering payment of Rs. 10 lakhs to the complainant within eight weeks or face imprisonment. The Trial Court's judgment was set aside, and the accused was directed to pay the specified amount. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401134