<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 888 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401133</link>
    <description>Quashing of the summoning order and criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was declined because disputes over the cheque, liability, notice service, and complaint maintainability required trial-level adjudication, and the complaint disclosed a prima facie case with no abuse of process shown. The accused was nonetheless given an opportunity to seek settlement and compounding before the trial court, with directions to appear within the stipulated time and obtain consideration in accordance with law and the governing Supreme Court directions. Interim protection from coercive measures was extended for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 888 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401133</link>
      <description>Quashing of the summoning order and criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was declined because disputes over the cheque, liability, notice service, and complaint maintainability required trial-level adjudication, and the complaint disclosed a prima facie case with no abuse of process shown. The accused was nonetheless given an opportunity to seek settlement and compounding before the trial court, with directions to appear within the stipulated time and obtain consideration in accordance with law and the governing Supreme Court directions. Interim protection from coercive measures was extended for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>