<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 31 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23886</link>
    <description>The High Court held that expenses on refreshments during director meetings, even if the directors were also employees, would be covered by section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized adherence to statutory provisions, ruling in favor of the Revenue and setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Each party was left to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 31 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23886</link>
      <description>The High Court held that expenses on refreshments during director meetings, even if the directors were also employees, would be covered by section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized adherence to statutory provisions, ruling in favor of the Revenue and setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Each party was left to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>