<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1456 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, recognizing the Petitioners as Financial Creditors due to their status as Home Buyers. It initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, appointed the proposed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and imposed a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, ensuring compliance with applicable rules during the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1456 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, recognizing the Petitioners as Financial Creditors due to their status as Home Buyers. It initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, appointed the proposed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and imposed a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, ensuring compliance with applicable rules during the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>