<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 878 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401123</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes to decide on the petitioner&#039;s representation within eight weeks. The Court did not express any opinion on the case merits. The writ petition and pending applications were disposed of, with the order to be uploaded on the website and sent to the counsel via email.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 878 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401123</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes to decide on the petitioner&#039;s representation within eight weeks. The Court did not express any opinion on the case merits. The writ petition and pending applications were disposed of, with the order to be uploaded on the website and sent to the counsel via email.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>