<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Alleged False Business for Money Laundering Investigated; High Court Upholds Factual Findings u/s 133B.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55667</link>
    <description>Treatment of sales as income from unexplained source - Allegation that Assessee had created a false business with the objective of laundering its unaccounted income is based on the enquiries conducted by the AO under Section 133B - Rule of consistency is a well-established and recognised principle applicable to the Income-Tax proceedings. Pertinently, the Respondent-Assessee had closed his business in July, 2015 after selling all the stocks and the survey carried out at a later stage would not have strong evidentiary value. Besides, all these aspects are completely factual in nature and we are unable to find any perversity in the impugned order. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:21:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:21:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Alleged False Business for Money Laundering Investigated; High Court Upholds Factual Findings u/s 133B.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55667</link>
      <description>Treatment of sales as income from unexplained source - Allegation that Assessee had created a false business with the objective of laundering its unaccounted income is based on the enquiries conducted by the AO under Section 133B - Rule of consistency is a well-established and recognised principle applicable to the Income-Tax proceedings. Pertinently, the Respondent-Assessee had closed his business in July, 2015 after selling all the stocks and the survey carried out at a later stage would not have strong evidentiary value. Besides, all these aspects are completely factual in nature and we are unable to find any perversity in the impugned order. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:21:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>