<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401113</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on income enhancement, restoring the matter for fresh consideration to provide the assessee with a fair hearing opportunity. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The tribunal highlighted the importance of proper notice and ruled against the inclusion of notional income without substantiating evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401113</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order on income enhancement, restoring the matter for fresh consideration to provide the assessee with a fair hearing opportunity. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The tribunal highlighted the importance of proper notice and ruled against the inclusion of notional income without substantiating evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>