<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (1) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291873</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the operative provisions of the Orissa Private Lands of Rulers (Assessment of Rent) Act, 1958 and the rules framed under it, rejecting the challenge that they were unconstitutional and ultra vires. It also declined to quash the assessment orders made under the Act, holding that the revenue authorities had acted within the statutory scheme. The petitions therefore failed, and the rent assessments on the petitioners&#039; lands were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (1) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291873</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the operative provisions of the Orissa Private Lands of Rulers (Assessment of Rent) Act, 1958 and the rules framed under it, rejecting the challenge that they were unconstitutional and ultra vires. It also declined to quash the assessment orders made under the Act, holding that the revenue authorities had acted within the statutory scheme. The petitions therefore failed, and the rent assessments on the petitioners&#039; lands were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>