<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 856 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401101</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the validity of the notice issued under section 148 by the Ld. AO, questioning jurisdiction, compliance with statutory provisions, addition of income, adequacy of inquiries, assessment by the Ld. CIT(A), and procedural aspects. The absence of representation resulted in an ex-parte disposal, with the judgment upholding the authorities&#039; actions and dismissing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 856 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401101</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the validity of the notice issued under section 148 by the Ld. AO, questioning jurisdiction, compliance with statutory provisions, addition of income, adequacy of inquiries, assessment by the Ld. CIT(A), and procedural aspects. The absence of representation resulted in an ex-parte disposal, with the judgment upholding the authorities&#039; actions and dismissing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>