<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 843 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401088</link>
    <description>The appeal under Sec. 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was allowed, setting aside the CESTAT Mumbai order dated 12.02.2019. The case was remanded to CESTAT for reconsideration, aligning with the larger bench&#039;s judgment that banks can avail credit for service tax paid to the Deposit Insurance Corporation. No costs were ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 843 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401088</link>
      <description>The appeal under Sec. 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was allowed, setting aside the CESTAT Mumbai order dated 12.02.2019. The case was remanded to CESTAT for reconsideration, aligning with the larger bench&#039;s judgment that banks can avail credit for service tax paid to the Deposit Insurance Corporation. No costs were ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>