https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401081 A private complaint alleging forgery and fraud was not quashed under inherent powers because the complaint and reply notice disclosed a prima facie dispute over issuance and ownership of the cheque. The accused's claim that the cheque had been returned and the amount repaid was unsupported by material at the quashing stage, and non-production of the cheque alone did not justify rejection of the complaint. Where the pleadings and supporting material showed a prima facie case, and no compelling material established abuse of process, the proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:49:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401081 A private complaint alleging forgery and fraud was not quashed under inherent powers because the complaint and reply notice disclosed a prima facie dispute over issuance and ownership of the cheque. The accused's claim that the cheque had been returned and the amount repaid was unsupported by material at the quashing stage, and non-production of the cheque alone did not justify rejection of the complaint. Where the pleadings and supporting material showed a prima facie case, and no compelling material established abuse of process, the proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401081