https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401077 The court quashed the orders for provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Emphasizing the importance of promptly addressing the Petitioner's representation under Rule 159 (5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, the court set deadlines for the decision to be communicated. The judgment aimed to ensure procedural fairness, timely resolution, and adherence to specified timelines, safeguarding the Petitioner's rights and promoting efficiency in the adjudicatory process. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401077 The court quashed the orders for provisional attachment of the Petitioner's bank accounts under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Emphasizing the importance of promptly addressing the Petitioner's representation under Rule 159 (5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, the court set deadlines for the decision to be communicated. The judgment aimed to ensure procedural fairness, timely resolution, and adherence to specified timelines, safeguarding the Petitioner's rights and promoting efficiency in the adjudicatory process. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401077