<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 830 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401075</link>
    <description>Bail was granted to petitioners facing allegations under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 after the HC considered their custody, the extent of their alleged role, and the maximum punishment indicated for the alleged offence under Section 132(1)(f). The Court accepted their contentions and found bail appropriate, subject to conditions securing appearance and restricting travel outside India without permission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 830 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401075</link>
      <description>Bail was granted to petitioners facing allegations under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 after the HC considered their custody, the extent of their alleged role, and the maximum punishment indicated for the alleged offence under Section 132(1)(f). The Court accepted their contentions and found bail appropriate, subject to conditions securing appearance and restricting travel outside India without permission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>