<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 829 - PATIALA HOUSE COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401074</link>
    <description>Bail was refused in a GST investigation because the Court balanced personal liberty against the investigating agency&#039;s need to preserve an effective inquiry. With the investigation still at a nascent stage, release was found likely to prejudice the probe, especially where the evidence was largely documentary and the risk of tampering could not be ruled out. On that basis, enlargement on bail was declined and the application was dismissed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 829 - PATIALA HOUSE COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401074</link>
      <description>Bail was refused in a GST investigation because the Court balanced personal liberty against the investigating agency&#039;s need to preserve an effective inquiry. With the investigation still at a nascent stage, release was found likely to prejudice the probe, especially where the evidence was largely documentary and the risk of tampering could not be ruled out. On that basis, enlargement on bail was declined and the application was dismissed in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>