<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 823 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and associated additions, including the Rs. 45,00,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 45,000 commission, due to procedural violations and lack of independent judicial application by the AO and Pr.CIT. The Tribunal found the approval process mechanical and the investigation inadequate, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and setting aside the reassessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 823 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and associated additions, including the Rs. 45,00,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 45,000 commission, due to procedural violations and lack of independent judicial application by the AO and Pr.CIT. The Tribunal found the approval process mechanical and the investigation inadequate, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and setting aside the reassessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>