<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 820 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the impugned orders and allowed the appeals of the assessee for all three Assessment Years, emphasizing the importance of taxing only the profit element in alleged bogus transactions and the limitations on the PCIT&#039;s revisional powers under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 820 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the impugned orders and allowed the appeals of the assessee for all three Assessment Years, emphasizing the importance of taxing only the profit element in alleged bogus transactions and the limitations on the PCIT&#039;s revisional powers under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>