<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 815 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on both issues. It upheld the classification of &#039;Railways Punitive charges&#039; as compensatory and allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, it confirmed the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, considering only investments yielding exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 815 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on both issues. It upheld the classification of &#039;Railways Punitive charges&#039; as compensatory and allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, it confirmed the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, considering only investments yielding exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>