<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order passed under Section 263, finding that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient inquiries into the share transactions and accepted the explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner had not conducted independent inquiries to prove the assessment order was erroneous. The appeal was allowed, and the original assessment order was reinstated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:10:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order passed under Section 263, finding that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient inquiries into the share transactions and accepted the explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner had not conducted independent inquiries to prove the assessment order was erroneous. The appeal was allowed, and the original assessment order was reinstated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>