<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 811 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order despite a procedural flaw and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It directed the deletion of Transfer Pricing adjustments related to the sale of goods to Associated Enterprises (AEs), Advertisement and Market Promotion (AMP) expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal determined that the methods used by the Transfer Pricing Officer were not appropriate and found in favor of the assessee on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 811 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order despite a procedural flaw and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It directed the deletion of Transfer Pricing adjustments related to the sale of goods to Associated Enterprises (AEs), Advertisement and Market Promotion (AMP) expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal determined that the methods used by the Transfer Pricing Officer were not appropriate and found in favor of the assessee on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>