<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 801 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401046</link>
    <description>For section 7 insolvency applications, limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies through section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and time spent in suspended recovery proceedings under section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies Act may be excluded when computing the three-year period. The computation must account for the dates of invocation of the corporate guarantee and the pendency of BIFR references, including periods excluded by statute. A corporate guarantor&#039;s liability remains coextensive with the principal borrower&#039;s liability until the secured debt is satisfied, and an assignee of the original lender may proceed against the guarantor. Discharge and limitation objections were rejected on these principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 801 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401046</link>
      <description>For section 7 insolvency applications, limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies through section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and time spent in suspended recovery proceedings under section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies Act may be excluded when computing the three-year period. The computation must account for the dates of invocation of the corporate guarantee and the pendency of BIFR references, including periods excluded by statute. A corporate guarantor&#039;s liability remains coextensive with the principal borrower&#039;s liability until the secured debt is satisfied, and an assignee of the original lender may proceed against the guarantor. Discharge and limitation objections were rejected on these principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>