<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1829 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291832</link>
    <description>The amended Section 60(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was examined for its effect on the maintainability of parallel proceedings concerning the same claim against a guarantor or principal borrower. The tribunal considered whether the amendment required reconsideration of that issue in the insolvency context. Notice was directed to be issued to the respondent, and the matter was posted for admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1829 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291832</link>
      <description>The amended Section 60(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was examined for its effect on the maintainability of parallel proceedings concerning the same claim against a guarantor or principal borrower. The tribunal considered whether the amendment required reconsideration of that issue in the insolvency context. Notice was directed to be issued to the respondent, and the matter was posted for admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>