<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2002 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291842</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta directed the respondents to file their affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, with a two-week period for the petitioner to reply. The court granted the parties the liberty to mention the matter for final hearing after the specified period for exchanging affidavits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:18:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2002 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291842</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta directed the respondents to file their affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, with a two-week period for the petitioner to reply. The court granted the parties the liberty to mention the matter for final hearing after the specified period for exchanging affidavits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>