https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291843 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal challenging disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, emphasizing the lack of substantive grounds for intervention. The court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge, finding the impugned order well-reasoned and legally sound, with no clear defects warranting interference. The application for stay was also dismissed, as the appeal was deemed to lack merit. The judgment underscored the absence of valid reasons for challenging the disqualification and affirmed the original decision. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:18:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291843 The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal challenging disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, emphasizing the lack of substantive grounds for intervention. The court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge, finding the impugned order well-reasoned and legally sound, with no clear defects warranting interference. The application for stay was also dismissed, as the appeal was deemed to lack merit. The judgment underscored the absence of valid reasons for challenging the disqualification and affirmed the original decision. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291843