https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291823 An application for amalgamation seeking dispensation of meetings under section 230(9) was held non-compliant because the supporting affidavits were executed on plain paper instead of bearing the stamp duty required for an affidavit, and no affidavit verifying the contents of the application was annexed as required by Rule 33(4) of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal treated these affidavit and stamping requirements as mandatory procedural conditions and held that failure to comply rendered the application not maintainable in the form filed, leading to dismissal. en-us Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:48:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291823 An application for amalgamation seeking dispensation of meetings under section 230(9) was held non-compliant because the supporting affidavits were executed on plain paper instead of bearing the stamp duty required for an affidavit, and no affidavit verifying the contents of the application was annexed as required by Rule 33(4) of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Tribunal treated these affidavit and stamping requirements as mandatory procedural conditions and held that failure to comply rendered the application not maintainable in the form filed, leading to dismissal. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291823