https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291815 Relief under Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act cannot be used to restrain interference with judicial acts of election officers where the alleged interference would occur outside the Court's territorial jurisdiction. The remedy was also unavailable because an adequate specific appellate remedy existed against the adverse election decision. Further, the order sought would not have afforded complete relief, as the appeals had already been decided and the impugned circular could no longer affect them. On those grounds, the order under Section 45 was held not legally sustainable and was set aside. en-us Fri, 25 Aug 1933 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:30:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291815 Relief under Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act cannot be used to restrain interference with judicial acts of election officers where the alleged interference would occur outside the Court's territorial jurisdiction. The remedy was also unavailable because an adequate specific appellate remedy existed against the adverse election decision. Further, the order sought would not have afforded complete relief, as the appeals had already been decided and the impugned circular could no longer affect them. On those grounds, the order under Section 45 was held not legally sustainable and was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Aug 1933 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291815