https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291814 Delivery of yarn to outside handloom weavers was held to fall within Clause 18B(1)(b) of the Cotton Cloth and Yarn (Control) Order, 1945 because the term "deliver" was given its ordinary meaning of handing over possession, including delivery to a bailee, and the clause was read broadly to advance controlled distribution. However, relief under Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 was unavailable where the acts complained of and the requested seizure and restoration lay outside the High Court's ordinary original civil jurisdiction. The result was that the control order covered the delivery, but the application could not be maintained for want of territorial competence. en-us Wed, 13 Jul 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:04:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291814 Delivery of yarn to outside handloom weavers was held to fall within Clause 18B(1)(b) of the Cotton Cloth and Yarn (Control) Order, 1945 because the term "deliver" was given its ordinary meaning of handing over possession, including delivery to a bailee, and the clause was read broadly to advance controlled distribution. However, relief under Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 was unavailable where the acts complained of and the requested seizure and restoration lay outside the High Court's ordinary original civil jurisdiction. The result was that the control order covered the delivery, but the application could not be maintained for want of territorial competence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jul 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291814