<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1889 (11) TMI 2 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291813</link>
    <description>Act IX of 1847 was construed as a machinery provision for assessing lands already liable to assessment, not as extending assessment power to reformed land within a permanently settled estate where full revenue had continued to be paid. Lands gained by alluvion or dereliction were treated as confined to changes occurring after settlement, so the phrase &quot;land added to any estate&quot; did not naturally cover such reformed land. The earlier Regulation of 1819 preserved civil-court recourse against unlawful revenue action, and that protection was not taken away by implication. Accordingly, the Civil Court retained jurisdiction to review the Board of Revenue&#039;s action, and the assessment proceedings were ultra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 1889 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:57:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1889 (11) TMI 2 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291813</link>
      <description>Act IX of 1847 was construed as a machinery provision for assessing lands already liable to assessment, not as extending assessment power to reformed land within a permanently settled estate where full revenue had continued to be paid. Lands gained by alluvion or dereliction were treated as confined to changes occurring after settlement, so the phrase &quot;land added to any estate&quot; did not naturally cover such reformed land. The earlier Regulation of 1819 preserved civil-court recourse against unlawful revenue action, and that protection was not taken away by implication. Accordingly, the Civil Court retained jurisdiction to review the Board of Revenue&#039;s action, and the assessment proceedings were ultra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 1889 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>