https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401034 A writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 130 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 was held not maintainable because a statutory appellate remedy was available under Section 107 of the Act. The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge and directed the petitioner to pursue the remedy of appeal provided by statute. No opinion was expressed on the legality of the impugned order, and the dispute was left to be addressed through the appellate mechanism. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401034 A writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 130 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 was held not maintainable because a statutory appellate remedy was available under Section 107 of the Act. The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge and directed the petitioner to pursue the remedy of appeal provided by statute. No opinion was expressed on the legality of the impugned order, and the dispute was left to be addressed through the appellate mechanism. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401034