<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 778 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401023</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the assessee complied with the conditions of the Industrial Park Scheme and Rule 18C(3) of the Income Tax Rules. It was determined that leasing multiple floors to a single company constituted separate industrial units, meeting the requirements. Additionally, the Court ruled that the timing of the deduction claim was valid, and the assessee did not violate the condition regarding the allocable industrial area. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 10:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 778 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401023</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the assessee complied with the conditions of the Industrial Park Scheme and Rule 18C(3) of the Income Tax Rules. It was determined that leasing multiple floors to a single company constituted separate industrial units, meeting the requirements. Additionally, the Court ruled that the timing of the deduction claim was valid, and the assessee did not violate the condition regarding the allocable industrial area. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>