<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 774 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA. The decision was based on justifying the adjustment of brought forward short term capital loss against declared income, as upheld in the quantum appeal. The Tribunal found no shortfall in tax payment on the losses, supporting the assessee&#039;s position and emphasizing the finality of the quantum proceedings&#039; order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 10:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 774 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA. The decision was based on justifying the adjustment of brought forward short term capital loss against declared income, as upheld in the quantum appeal. The Tribunal found no shortfall in tax payment on the losses, supporting the assessee&#039;s position and emphasizing the finality of the quantum proceedings&#039; order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>