<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 771 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order and the disallowance of Rs. 151,90,00,000 under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act. It found the license fee to be an exclusive levy on the assessee, in line with the statutory provisions. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the correct application of the law to curb tax avoidance practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 10:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 771 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order and the disallowance of Rs. 151,90,00,000 under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act. It found the license fee to be an exclusive levy on the assessee, in line with the statutory provisions. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the correct application of the law to curb tax avoidance practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>