https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291805 The account was not mutual in law because occasional balances in favour of the defendants did not create reciprocal demands, so the claim for the balance of account could not be treated as one on a mutual, open and current account. Article 85 of the Limitation Act therefore did not apply, and the suit was liable to fail. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291805 The account was not mutual in law because occasional balances in favour of the defendants did not create reciprocal demands, so the claim for the balance of account could not be treated as one on a mutual, open and current account. Article 85 of the Limitation Act therefore did not apply, and the suit was liable to fail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jan 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291805