https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291804 A notification altering territorial jurisdiction does not by itself divest the court that passed a mortgage decree of power to execute it, because such a change operates prospectively unless it expressly transfers pending business. Execution in another court requires the statutory mechanism of transmission under the Code of Civil Procedure; territorial shift alone does not confer automatic execution jurisdiction on the transferee court. The order allowing execution by the transferee court was therefore set aside, and the dismissal of execution for want of transmission was restored. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291804 A notification altering territorial jurisdiction does not by itself divest the court that passed a mortgage decree of power to execute it, because such a change operates prospectively unless it expressly transfers pending business. Execution in another court requires the statutory mechanism of transmission under the Code of Civil Procedure; territorial shift alone does not confer automatic execution jurisdiction on the transferee court. The order allowing execution by the transferee court was therefore set aside, and the dismissal of execution for want of transmission was restored. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 18 Jan 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291804