https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401002 The Tribunal found in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the sale agreement of land to Respondent No. 14 due to oppression and mismanagement. The petitioner was allowed to sell their shares to existing shareholders or third parties. Respondent No. 1 was directed to return the sale price to Respondent No. 14 with interest. The request for winding up the company was denied, emphasizing the need to pursue other remedies first. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401002 The Tribunal found in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the sale agreement of land to Respondent No. 14 due to oppression and mismanagement. The petitioner was allowed to sell their shares to existing shareholders or third parties. Respondent No. 1 was directed to return the sale price to Respondent No. 14 with interest. The request for winding up the company was denied, emphasizing the need to pursue other remedies first. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401002