<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 754 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400999</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Appeal due to an alternative remedy being available before the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals). The Assessee was directed to deposit Rs. 1,50,000/- within 4 weeks and file the Appeal within the same period for the Appeal to proceed. The Court specified that the Appeal would be heard on merits by the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals). The Writ Appeal was disposed of with this directive, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:33:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 754 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400999</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Writ Appeal due to an alternative remedy being available before the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals). The Assessee was directed to deposit Rs. 1,50,000/- within 4 weeks and file the Appeal within the same period for the Appeal to proceed. The Court specified that the Appeal would be heard on merits by the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals). The Writ Appeal was disposed of with this directive, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>