<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 753 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400998</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal as the services provided by the appellant were held not taxable under Management or Business Consultant Service for the disputed period. The demand for service tax prior to 16.5.2008 was deemed invalid, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation was rejected. Penalties and interest were set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. The decision was rendered in Open Court on 24/11/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 753 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400998</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal as the services provided by the appellant were held not taxable under Management or Business Consultant Service for the disputed period. The demand for service tax prior to 16.5.2008 was deemed invalid, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation was rejected. Penalties and interest were set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential relief. The decision was rendered in Open Court on 24/11/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>