<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1516 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291798</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the seventh defendant, concluding that specific properties belong solely to her based on evidence and legal principles applied. The judgment confirmed the daughter&#039;s entitlement to shares in properties covered by particular sale deeds but disputed ownership of other properties. The court emphasized the need for clear evidence to rebut the statutory presumption of benami transactions and determine property ownership conclusively. The validity of a registered Will was also addressed, impacting property distribution. The Appeal Suit and Cross Objections were allowed, setting aside the daughter&#039;s claim to certain properties while confirming her entitlement to others pending determination of the Will&#039;s authenticity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1516 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291798</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the seventh defendant, concluding that specific properties belong solely to her based on evidence and legal principles applied. The judgment confirmed the daughter&#039;s entitlement to shares in properties covered by particular sale deeds but disputed ownership of other properties. The court emphasized the need for clear evidence to rebut the statutory presumption of benami transactions and determine property ownership conclusively. The validity of a registered Will was also addressed, impacting property distribution. The Appeal Suit and Cross Objections were allowed, setting aside the daughter&#039;s claim to certain properties while confirming her entitlement to others pending determination of the Will&#039;s authenticity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>