<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1677 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the notice issued under section 148 before the expiry of the time period for issuing notice under section 143(2) was bad in law. Consequently, the reassessment order based on such notice was also deemed invalid. The reassessment order under section 143(3)/147 was canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The other grounds of appeal regarding the merits of addition were dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced in open court on 8/11/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:12:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1677 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the notice issued under section 148 before the expiry of the time period for issuing notice under section 143(2) was bad in law. Consequently, the reassessment order based on such notice was also deemed invalid. The reassessment order under section 143(3)/147 was canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The other grounds of appeal regarding the merits of addition were dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced in open court on 8/11/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>