https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291775 Police expense recovery under the Police Act, 1861 depended on lawful apportionment by the District Magistrate under Section 15(4); because the apportionment was made by a Deputy Magistrate and the later dismissal of the appeal did not cure that defect, distress recovery under Section 16 was invalid. Money collected for the benefit of the Local Government and applied to the police force could nevertheless be claimed back from the Secretary of State, since governmental responsibility extended to restitution of sums unlawfully taken and retained within the Indian revenue framework. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 1912 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:08:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291775 Police expense recovery under the Police Act, 1861 depended on lawful apportionment by the District Magistrate under Section 15(4); because the apportionment was made by a Deputy Magistrate and the later dismissal of the appeal did not cure that defect, distress recovery under Section 16 was invalid. Money collected for the benefit of the Local Government and applied to the police force could nevertheless be claimed back from the Secretary of State, since governmental responsibility extended to restitution of sums unlawfully taken and retained within the Indian revenue framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Dec 1912 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291775