<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (6) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291774</link>
    <description>State liability for payments made on forged cheques depends on the nature of the function performed by treasury officials. Where the officials act under statutory duties, rather than in the course of a commercial or private business undertaking, ordinary vicarious liability for torts does not apply. The treasury staff were negligent in failing to compare signatures with specimen signatures, but the treasury arrangements for District Board cheques did not convert the State&#039;s role into banking or a commercial enterprise. On that basis, the State was treated as immune from liability on the facts discussed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (6) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291774</link>
      <description>State liability for payments made on forged cheques depends on the nature of the function performed by treasury officials. Where the officials act under statutory duties, rather than in the course of a commercial or private business undertaking, ordinary vicarious liability for torts does not apply. The treasury staff were negligent in failing to compare signatures with specimen signatures, but the treasury arrangements for District Board cheques did not convert the State&#039;s role into banking or a commercial enterprise. On that basis, the State was treated as immune from liability on the facts discussed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>