<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (12) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291772</link>
    <description>A challenge to local cess under Section 79(iii) of the Madras Local Boards Act, 1920 was analysed on two points: civil court jurisdiction and the method of calculating annual rent value. The court stated that statutory finality attached to the Board of Revenue&#039;s decision did not, by itself, oust civil jurisdiction; exclusion must be express or arise by necessary implication, and a challenge to levy on an unlawful basis remained maintainable. On computation, Section 79(iii) was read according to its plain wording: actual rent governed lands held by tenants, while lands occupied by the landholder or otherwise rent-free were to be valued by reference to rents of similar neighbouring lands, without importing ryotwari concepts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (12) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291772</link>
      <description>A challenge to local cess under Section 79(iii) of the Madras Local Boards Act, 1920 was analysed on two points: civil court jurisdiction and the method of calculating annual rent value. The court stated that statutory finality attached to the Board of Revenue&#039;s decision did not, by itself, oust civil jurisdiction; exclusion must be express or arise by necessary implication, and a challenge to levy on an unlawful basis remained maintainable. On computation, Section 79(iii) was read according to its plain wording: actual rent governed lands held by tenants, while lands occupied by the landholder or otherwise rent-free were to be valued by reference to rents of similar neighbouring lands, without importing ryotwari concepts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>