<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 735 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400980</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowed funds used in project business was treated as a periodic business cost and, because the assessee had consistently followed that accounting method and it had been accepted in earlier scrutiny years, it was not required to be capitalised to work-in-progress. Remuneration paid to directors was also protected from full disallowance under section 40A(2)(a), since the provision permits only the excessive or unreasonable component to be disallowed on a proper benchmark of fair market value, business need and benefit derived; the directors had rendered substantial services and the payments had been accepted in earlier years. The additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:11:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 735 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400980</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowed funds used in project business was treated as a periodic business cost and, because the assessee had consistently followed that accounting method and it had been accepted in earlier scrutiny years, it was not required to be capitalised to work-in-progress. Remuneration paid to directors was also protected from full disallowance under section 40A(2)(a), since the provision permits only the excessive or unreasonable component to be disallowed on a proper benchmark of fair market value, business need and benefit derived; the directors had rendered substantial services and the payments had been accepted in earlier years. The additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>