<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 57 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23847</link>
    <description>Section 34B of the Wealth-tax Act was considered in relation to gifted shares said to have been included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; deletion of the addition, on the basis that the Wealth-tax Officer was not justified in invoking section 34B to include the value of the gifted assets. The Court held that the propriety of invoking section 34B and the Tribunal&#039;s affirmation of the deletion raised a question of law requiring its opinion, and therefore allowed the application under section 27(3) and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the framed question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 57 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23847</link>
      <description>Section 34B of the Wealth-tax Act was considered in relation to gifted shares said to have been included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; deletion of the addition, on the basis that the Wealth-tax Officer was not justified in invoking section 34B to include the value of the gifted assets. The Court held that the propriety of invoking section 34B and the Tribunal&#039;s affirmation of the deletion raised a question of law requiring its opinion, and therefore allowed the application under section 27(3) and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the framed question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>