<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 725 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the department failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the denial of Cenvat Credit and input service tax credit. The appeals were allowed, and the demand was set aside. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and proper verification by the department before rejecting credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 725 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the department failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify the denial of Cenvat Credit and input service tax credit. The appeals were allowed, and the demand was set aside. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and proper verification by the department before rejecting credit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>