https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400967 The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Petitions challenging tax liability orders under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, emphasizing the necessity of utilizing statutory appeal remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The Court highlighted that Article 226 of the Constitution should not be used to bypass statutory procedures unless exceptional circumstances exist, such as questioning the vires of the statute or intertwining public wrongs with public justice. The Court expressed concerns over the misuse of writ petitions for interim orders and prolonged proceedings, refraining from expressing an opinion on the case's merits due to available statutory remedies. en-us Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:50:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400967 The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Petitions challenging tax liability orders under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, emphasizing the necessity of utilizing statutory appeal remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The Court highlighted that Article 226 of the Constitution should not be used to bypass statutory procedures unless exceptional circumstances exist, such as questioning the vires of the statute or intertwining public wrongs with public justice. The Court expressed concerns over the misuse of writ petitions for interim orders and prolonged proceedings, refraining from expressing an opinion on the case's merits due to available statutory remedies. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400967