https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400965 A condition requiring the accused to deposit 20% of the compensation amount while seeking suspension of sentence in an appeal under the Negotiable Instruments Act was held to be consistent with the statutory framework. The court found the direction aligned with the mandate governing appeals against convictions, including the interaction between the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 389(1) CrPC. No infirmity or legal error was identified in imposing the deposit requirement, and the request to modify that condition was rejected. en-us Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:46:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400965 A condition requiring the accused to deposit 20% of the compensation amount while seeking suspension of sentence in an appeal under the Negotiable Instruments Act was held to be consistent with the statutory framework. The court found the direction aligned with the mandate governing appeals against convictions, including the interaction between the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 389(1) CrPC. No infirmity or legal error was identified in imposing the deposit requirement, and the request to modify that condition was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400965