<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1350 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291745</link>
    <description>An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as subject to Article 137 of the Limitation Act, so the three-year period ran from the pleaded date of default; on the facts noted, the petition was treated as time-barred and not admissible. The note also records that a home-buyer-led Section 7 petition may be scrutinised closely where the flat is ready for possession, a completion certificate has been obtained, and the surrounding facts indicate a claim for further compensation rather than genuine insolvency resolution. On that basis, the application was considered unsuitable for admission on merits and the claimant was left to pursue compensation before the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:38:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1350 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291745</link>
      <description>An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as subject to Article 137 of the Limitation Act, so the three-year period ran from the pleaded date of default; on the facts noted, the petition was treated as time-barred and not admissible. The note also records that a home-buyer-led Section 7 petition may be scrutinised closely where the flat is ready for possession, a completion certificate has been obtained, and the surrounding facts indicate a claim for further compensation rather than genuine insolvency resolution. On that basis, the application was considered unsuitable for admission on merits and the claimant was left to pursue compensation before the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>