<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1563 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CUTTACK BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291735</link>
    <description>A section 7 insolvency application was found unsustainable where contemporaneous records showed the financial creditor acted on RBI instructions rather than an independent commercial decision. The applicable principle was that directions to initiate insolvency resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must be traceable to section 35AA of the Banking Regulation Act, while RBI&#039;s other powers over stressed assets remain distinct. Because the materials indicated that the corporate debtor was referred to NCLT pursuant to RBI instructions without the required Central Government concurrence, the insolvency petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:38:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1563 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CUTTACK BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291735</link>
      <description>A section 7 insolvency application was found unsustainable where contemporaneous records showed the financial creditor acted on RBI instructions rather than an independent commercial decision. The applicable principle was that directions to initiate insolvency resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must be traceable to section 35AA of the Banking Regulation Act, while RBI&#039;s other powers over stressed assets remain distinct. Because the materials indicated that the corporate debtor was referred to NCLT pursuant to RBI instructions without the required Central Government concurrence, the insolvency petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>