<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1594 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291754</link>
    <description>The High Court judgment addressed the inter se dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the commercial tax department, emphasizing adherence to principles set by the Supreme Court. The parties agreed to a consent order regarding the State Government&#039;s approach to their rights, simplifying the resolution process. The State Government clarified the implementation of orders and acknowledged the need to update seniority lists. The court rejected controversial promotions for promotees nearing retirement against direct recruit posts, aiming to prevent further disputes. The judgment aimed to provide a structured framework for resolving the dispute in line with established principles and court orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1594 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291754</link>
      <description>The High Court judgment addressed the inter se dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the commercial tax department, emphasizing adherence to principles set by the Supreme Court. The parties agreed to a consent order regarding the State Government&#039;s approach to their rights, simplifying the resolution process. The State Government clarified the implementation of orders and acknowledged the need to update seniority lists. The court rejected controversial promotions for promotees nearing retirement against direct recruit posts, aiming to prevent further disputes. The judgment aimed to provide a structured framework for resolving the dispute in line with established principles and court orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>