https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291762 An application under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure must be decided only on the plaint and its averments, without examining the written statement or other external material. On that limited scrutiny, a plaint cannot be rejected unless the bar to maintainability is apparent from the plaint itself. A broader plea that the suit is barred under Section 7L(4) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, or that material facts were suppressed, may be considered as a preliminary issue, but it does not justify threshold rejection of the plaint. The trial court's order rejecting the application was therefore left undisturbed. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:38:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291762 An application under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure must be decided only on the plaint and its averments, without examining the written statement or other external material. On that limited scrutiny, a plaint cannot be rejected unless the bar to maintainability is apparent from the plaint itself. A broader plea that the suit is barred under Section 7L(4) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, or that material facts were suppressed, may be considered as a preliminary issue, but it does not justify threshold rejection of the plaint. The trial court's order rejecting the application was therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291762